|
Overview
The Associate Vice President for Student Development
and Assistant Dean of Students are responsible for implementation
of the Code of Conduct. University jurisdiction shall
be limited to conduct that occurs on University property,
at University-related events, or that adversely affects
the University community. Given that the University's
interest in student welfare is not bound by campus property
lines, its commitment to neighborhood relations is high,
and a positive reputation within the broader Kansas
City community is essential for its continued well-being,
the University reserves the right to act on violations
that occur off- campus or at University-sponsored or
sanctioned events and activities regardless of location.
The
adjudication process is designed to be primarily educative
and developmental in nature. Pursuing the Ignatian principle
that Rockhurst students become “men and women for others,”
students will grow in their ability to embrace present
responsibilities and consequences and make positive
choices in the future that benefit themselves and their
community. The Code of Conduct's Student Creed and Philosophy
are shared across the institution as the expectations
for all Rockhurst students.
When
the behavior of a student poses an immediate threat
to the safety of the University suspension or removal
from the University, restriction on access to residence
halls, the campus, or participation in any University-sponsored/sanctioned
event or activity. This judgment is exercised through
the Associate Vice President for Student Development
or designee and remains in effect pending a hearing
under the appropriate University disciplinary procedures.
The Assistant Dean
of Students is responsible for initiating disciplinary
proceedings where there is reasonable cause to believe
an offense under the Code of Conduct has occurred and
disciplinary action is appropriate. Student non-academic
disciplinary records are maintained by Residence Life.
These records include all written correspondence concerning
violations of University policies and are only released
with the written permission of the student (or as required
by law).
top
Hearings
1. Individual hearing
If you are charged with a Student Code of Conduct Violation
and are called to an individual hearing you will most
likely be in one of the Resident Director's offices.
You might also be called to come to the Assistant Dean
of Student's Office. At this hearing it will be you
and the hearing examiner (a Resident Director or the
Assistant Dean of Students.) This in an informal hearing
where you will be asked to share what you know about
the incident that you are charged with being involved.
At this hearing a few things can happen:
The
first type of hearing is when you and the Hearing examiner
agree on the facts surrounding the incident and your
responsibility for the incident. If sanctions are necessary,
the two of you will decide on what is appropriate and
helpful. When this happens the student and the hearing
examiner sign a Mutual Agreement form, meaning that
you both are in agreement. A Mutual Agreement is not
appealable.
The second type
of individual hearing is when the student and hearing
examiner do not agree on the facts surrounding the incident.
In this instance the hearing examiner can either sanction
the student if necessary or send the student to a Hearing
Committee made up of one Faculty, one staff member,
and one students. Sanctions given by the Hearing examiner
in this care are appealable.
Who could
be at my individual hearing?
Hearing Examiner - The Assistant Dean of Students or
designate. A Hearing Examiner will review facts related
to allegations of non-academic misconduct by a student
or student organization most often considered to be
less serious in nature and will make findings and, if
the student or organization is found in violation of
the Code of Conduct, impose sanctions.
Advisor
- Each student or student organization will be afforded
the opportunity to have a faculty or staff advisor present
at a hearing either with an examiner or committee. The
advisor role is to help the student or student organization
understand the responsibilities and rights afforded
by the Code of Conduct process, and to encourage honest
and forthright engagement in the process and between
Hearing Examiner/Hearing Committee and the student or
student organization. The advisor's role during the
actual hearing is limited in scope and should reflect
a supportive stance of both the student and the University.
2.
Committee Hearing
Consists of three voting members (a faculty member,
a staff member, and a student) and is specifically constituted
for cases that involved allegations of considered to
be more serious misconduct. Either the faculty member
or the staff member will serve as the chair of the Hearing
Committee. Although every effort will be made to conduct
the Hearing Committee with one student, one faculty
and one staff, it may not be possible, especially during
the summer, and the Hearing Committee may consist of
any three members of the University community. The Hearing
Committee will review facts related to allegations of
non-academic misconduct against a student or student
organization and will make their findings and, if the
student or student organization is found in violation
of the Code of Conduct, impose sanctions
Who could
be at my hearing?
Hearing Examiner - The Assistant Dean of Students or
designate. A Hearing Examiner will review facts related
to allegations of non-academic misconduct by a student
or student organization most often considered to be
less serious in nature and will make findings and, if
the student or organization is found in violation of
the Code of Conduct, impose sanctions.
top
Investigating
Officer - The Assistant Dean of Students or designate.
This person consolidates historical and evidentiary
data related to the charges against the student or student
organization for the purposes of a hearing committee.
This person presents this information to the committee
for their review, and also suggests possible sanctions
based upon the severity of the alleged infraction, disciplinary
history of the charged student or student organization,
and historical precedent.
Advisor
- Each student or student organization will be afforded
the opportunity to have a faculty or staff advisor present
at a hearing either with an examiner or committee. The
advisor role is to help the student or student organization
understand the responsibilities and rights afforded
by the Code of Conduct process, and to encourage honest
and forthright engagement in the process and between
Hearing Examiner/Hearing Committee and the student or
student organization. The advisor's role during the
actual hearing is limited in scope and should reflect
a supportive stance of both the student and the University.
Faculty, staff,
and students who are asked to be involved in the Code
of Conduct process should avoid roles that create a
conflict of interest, for example, close friend of charged
student, current professor for charged student, or advisor
to student organization etc).
Appeal
Process
It is the right of students to use the appeal process
if they feel that they meet one of the following appeal
reasons:
An appeal is not a rehearing and is not granted on the
basis of disagreement with the original decision. Acceptable
basis for an appeal is limited to the following:
- There was a denial of a fair hearing;
- There is new and additional evidence not available
at the time of the hearing;
- There was insufficient evidence to establish the
student's misconduct or responsibility for the misconduct;
- The decision was arbitrary and capricious.
What do I need
to do and what can happen at an appeal?
An intent to appeal the decision of either the Hearing
Examiner or Committee must be filed in writing to the
Associate Vice President for Student Development in
the Office of Student Development (Massman 1) within
three (3) business days of receipt of the written decision
(or attempt to deliver). The intent to appeal must specify
the basis on which the student is appealing, the decision
or part of the decision including sanctions that the
student is appealing, and the facts in support of the
appeal.
The Associate Vice
President for Student Development will decide on the
appropriate University administrator to address the
appeal (normally the Assistant Dean of Students or the
Associate Vice President for Student Development). Every
attempt will be made to review an appeal as expeditiously
as possible. Until the appeal is reviewed and a decision
rendered, the student's status at the University remains
unchanged.
top
The appropriate
University administrator will review documents relevant
to the appeal and speak with the Hearing Examiner or
Committee Members or the appealing student as needed.
The student may request a hearing before the appropriate
University administrator that the appropriate University
administrator may, in his/her discretion, grant or deny.
If a hearing on an appeal is granted, the appealing
student will meet with the appropriate University administrator.
Any decision to grant or deny a hearing on appeal is
not appealable.
An
appeal may result in one of the following actions:
a. Leaving the original sanction intact.
b. Reversal of the original decision or sanction(s);
c. Modification of the sanction(s), including changes
that could result in either a reduction or increase
in sanctions, appropriate to the misconduct or based
on new information considered during appeal (see section
3.b. above).
The University administrator
shall provide the student with a written decision on
the appeal. The decision of the Associate Vice President
for Student Development or designate shall be the final
appeal authority for the University in all cases of
non-academic discipline.
Preparing
for a hearing
1. How to Prepare for an Individual Hearings
Students should feel that they are prepared for their
hearing. If students have questions prior to their hearing
they should come to Massman 2 to speak to the Assistant
Dean of Students or to their Resident Director.
Throughout the Hearing,
keep in mind that the intent of the Student Development
Team is to support each student as he/she interacts
with Rockhurst's Disciplinary Process. The system is
an internal administrative process used by the University
to resolve allegations of misconduct by our students.
The goal is to discover the truth of the allegations.
The University hopes that students who engage in misconduct
will take responsibility for their actions in a mature
way that demonstrates commitment to the education of
themselves and others. The Student Code of Conduct seeks
to ensure high standards of courtesy and integrity,
to prevent educational disruption, and to promote a
productive learning environment. At the same time, we
all must recognize the reality of human fallibility,
as well as, stresses associated with collegiate life.
The Rockhurst community is hurt if a student is found
responsible for engaging in actions prohibited by the
Student Code of Conduct and /or the University. A Charged
Student should:
- Read carefully the "Charge
Letter." The Charge Letter provides you with
details of the allegations against you. It states
the specific Rule(s) that you have been charged
with violating. It schedules the date, time and
location of the Hearing.
- Confirm that the date and
time of the Hearing does not conflict with your
other scheduled responsibilities. Resolving this
matter is extremely important and should be your
priority over most things, except class and family
responsibilities. Call to reschedule if there is
a conflict or if you are unsure of the location
of the Conference.
- Read the Student Code of
Conduct. Pay particular attention to the explanation
of the guidelines you have been charged with violating.
Read over the sanctions and conditions so that you
are aware of the meaning and implications of each.
- Think about what happened
on the date in question. Write down everything you
remember, including who was present, what was said,
and what your feelings were.
- Decide whether you will bring
an advisor with you to the Hearing. The advisor
provides advice and support to you and may not speak
for you. Check to be sure your advisor's schedule
does not conflict with the Hearing. If there is
a problem, call the number at the bottom of your
Charge Letter to discuss it.
- Arrive five (5) minutes early
for your Hearing. A late arrival might result in
rescheduling of your Hearing or a decision on the
allegations in your absence.
- Prepare yourself to discuss
the incident in detail at the Hearing.
- At the Hearing, share your
written version and any other written statements
you have received. Speak openly and honestly with
the staff person. Express yourself in an appropriate
respectful manner, similar to the way you wish to
be treated.
top
2. How
to Prepare for a Committee hearing
All committee hearings are held at the Community Center
(Campus Security Department). Students should report
there a few minutes before their hearing time. At the
hearing there will be a committee made up of a faculty
member, staff member, and student. The Assistant Dean
of Students will be presenting the University's case
and has no vote. Both you and the University may have
witnesses. You are allowed up to one character witness.
You are also allowed to have a Rockhurst Faculty or
staff advisor present. Your advisor cannot address witness
and should be there only to guide you and answer your
questions. Parents and Lawyers are not permitted to
be in the hearing.
Both
the university and the charged student are allowed to
share their side and will have the opportunity to question
the witnesses. After all of the information is presented
the three(3) committee members will go into deliberation
to decide if the charged student is responsible or not.
If the student is found responsible, the committee will
receive the student's discipline file, academic records,
and financial aid records. They will then determine
what sanctions are appropriate. They will then share
their sanctions with the students and university.
If
a student wishes to appeal the decision they should
follow the university appeal process.
Advisors
As a student you always have the right to have an advisor
present for an individual or committee hearing. The
advisor can be any Rockhurst University faculty or staff
member. Advisors are used to give advise before and
during the hearing. They cannot address the hearing
committee or ask questions of witnesses. If you are
planning on having an advisor please share the advisor
guidelines (PDF, 25 k) with that faculty or staff
member. If you do not have an advisor, but wish to have
one please contact the Office of Residence Life for
a listing of trained advisors.
Witnesses
You are allowed to have witnesses to testify about the
facts surrounding the case. You must submit a Committee
Hearing Witness form 48 hours prior to the scheduled
hearing date. You must submit what the witnesses will
be testifying about. If there are repetitive witnesses,
some witnesses will not be asked to attend. You may
also have one character witness who can speak about
you personally (Rockhurst faculty, staff, or student).
They do not have to have any information about the incident
that you are being charged for. |